Back

Cost-effectiveness of Anaesthesia maintained with Sevoflurane or Propofol with and without addi-tional monitoring: A prospective, randomised controlled trial

Clinical Research 8 min 133

Font Size

Created On: 14/01/2020

Cost-effectiveness of Anaesthesia maintained with Sevoflurane or Propofol with and without addi-tional monitoring: A prospective, randomised controlled trial

Inadequate depth of anaesthesia is associated with significant morbidity.

See All

Key take away

The findings of the present randomised trial determined that the use of BIS and TOF monitoring have the potential to hasten postoperative recovery, and it can also decrease the total cost of anaesthesia drugs.

Background

Inadequate depth of anaesthesia is associated with significant morbidity. The risk of complications and cost of anaesthesia can increase with a rise in the required depth of anaesthesia. It can also lead to prolonged recovery time and increased health-care costs. Inadequately light anaesthesia can maximize the risk of intraoperative awareness, whereas incomplete reversal of neuromuscular blockade results in residual neuromuscular weakness with undesirable consequences. Various monitoring techniques can be helpful in reducing complications of anaesthesia in the perioperative period. Only a few studies published on simultaneous monitoring of depth of anaesthesia with bispectral index (BIS) and neuromuscular blockade with train-of-four (TOF). The cost of these monitoring techniques influence the treatment methods, and it is vital to managing the costs of these techniques to reach maximal gains. The cost of a particular activity, treatment, working process constitutes fixed and variable parts. There must be a balance between the values of various agents, pharmacodynamic advantages of anaesthetics (e.g. sevoflurane, propofol), perioperative complications, and patient monitoring techniques. Numerous studies have evaluated the cost-effectiveness of anaesthetic measures, but there is a lack of evidence that can depict the profitability of BIS and TOF monitoring associated with anaesthesia.

Rationale behind research

Previous research has focused only on the cost of maintaining anaesthesia and others additional costs, but there are just a few studies that have investigated simultaneous monitoring of depth of anaesthesia with bispectral index (BIS) and neuromuscular blockade with train-of-four (TOF). So, the present study was aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of BIS and TOF monitoring associated with anaesthesia.

Objective

The study aimed to compare drug dosage and total cost (direct plus additional fees) of anaesthesia maintained with sevoflurane or propofol with or without the combination of BIS and TOF monitoring, respectively.

Method

Study outcomes

Baseline: Patient demographic characteristics were studied at baseline
Primary issues: The primary outcome studied was the total cost of anaesthesia
Secondary outcomes: The secondary outcome studied was time spent in theatre and recovery room

· Time Points: NA

Result

Outcomes

Baseline: There were no significant differences observed at baseline

Study outcomes:

There was a greater difference in the total cost of anesthesia per hour in group SEVO+ compared to SEVO [€ 19.95(8.53) vs. 12.15(5. 32), p < 0.001], and in group PROP+ compared to PROP (€ 22.11(8.08) vs. 13.23(4.23), p < 0.001] (Fig 2)

The time of extubation was shorter in group SEVO+ compared to SEVO [11.1(4.7) vs. 14.5(3.9) min, p = 0.002], and in PROP+ compared to PROP [12.6(5.4) vs. 15.2(4.7) min, p < 0.001] (Fig 3)

Arterial blood pressure returned to its initial values only in groups SEVO+ and PROP+, postoperatively

Conclusion

The results of the study indicated a lower drug cost of sevoflurane and propofol anaesthesia with BIS and TOF as compared to sevoflurane and propofol anaesthesia without BIS and TOF monitoring. The total cost of anaesthesia drug was reduced with BIS monitoring, but there was a rise in the total cost of anaesthesia. There was no effect of TOF monitoring observed the value of atracurium during anaesthesia. The lower price of propofol as induction agents on BIS monitoring depicts that depth of anaesthesia can cause a reduction of dose during the induction of anaesthesia. The lower hourly cost of fentanyl during anaesthesia in groups SEVO and SEVO+ compared to PROP, and PROP+ was due to the analgesic effect of sevoflurane rather than the use of depth of anaesthesia monitoring. It can be explained by the similar patient (e.g. age, body weight) and operational characteristics (the type of surgery, time of surgery and anaesthesia) in all groups. Besides, the cost associated with propofol anaesthesia with BIS monitoring was higher as compared to Sevoflurane anaesthesia without BIS monitoring (group SEVO). The reason behind this was the higher cost of intravenous technique and the disposable BIS sensor. These results were not contradictory to previous studies, and this may occur due to the small number of recruited patients. The time of extubation become shorter when BIS and TOF monitoring was employed. The time to MAP restoration was independent of BIS monitoring. In summary, it was concluded that anaesthesia guided by BIS and TOF provides faster postoperative recovery with lower drug cost and higher disposable costs.

Limitations

A large no. of patients were excluded from the study that might limit the interpretation of the results
The study recruited only a small number of patients, and the results of the study applied to anaesthesia for ENT surgery.
The cost of anaesthesia was estimated only from pharmacy prices in the hospital that can vary according to different places and hospitals

Clinical take-away

The present prospective study indicates the use of BIS and TOF monitoring which may hasten postoperative recovery after ENT surgery, but there is need of further analysis in future to clarify the benefits of BIS monitoring particularly in high-risk such as patients with ASA III-IV and history of intraoperative awareness or increased hemodynamic risk.

Source:

Bocskai et al. BMC Anesthesiology (2018) 18:100

Link:

https://bmcanesthesiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12871-018-0563-z

Article:

Cost-effectiveness of anesthesia maintained with sevoflurane or propofol with and without additional monitoring: a prospective, randomized controlled trial