EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

Back
Trial evaluates dermis fat and plain gap arthroplasty for treating TMJ ankylosis Trial evaluates dermis fat and plain gap arthroplasty for treating TMJ ankylosis
Trial evaluates dermis fat and plain gap arthroplasty for treating TMJ ankylosis Trial evaluates dermis fat and plain gap arthroplasty for treating TMJ ankylosis

What's new?

Both plain gap and dermis fat arthroplasty are equally effective for treating patients with ankylosis of the TMJ (temporomandibular joint).

In a recent study, it was found that both plain gap and dermis fat arthroplasty techniques have similar results in the treatment of ankylosis of the TMJ. Both techniques demonstrated similar outcomes at the end of three years’ follow up. No remarkable difference in mouth opening was witnessed.


A single-blind, randomized, controlled analysis was carried out to compare interpositional arthroplasty utilizing a dermis fat graft with gap arthroplasty in the management of TMJ ankylosis. From December 2014 to December 2015, this study recruited a total of 22 patients with ankylosis of the TMJ. Subjects were randomly assigned to either plain gap arthroplasty or dermis fat arthroplasty group.


The primary outcome measure was gain in mouth opening (maximum interincisal distance). The secondary outcome measure was pain during jaw exercises. On days 5 and 14, at the end of 1 and 6 months, and 1, 2 and 3 years, interincisal opening and pain were examined.


A substantial difference was witnessed between both the groups on postoperative day 5 and at one year. Results were expressed as mean (SD). The mean (SD) scores for mouth-opening were elevated in the dermis fat group at all times 41.20 (4.69) mm in comparison with 39.50 (2.46) mm in gap arthroplasty at two years, and 41.40 (3.60) mm compared with 38.9 (2.02) mm at three years as depicted in Table 1:


Postoperative pain scores in both groups were evaluated by a visual analogue scale (VAS). In the dermis fat graft group, the visual analogue pain scores were also lower as illustrated in Table 2:


Both the groups demonstrated similar results at the end of three years follow up, with no remarkable difference in mouth opening. Thus, both techniques can be utilized for managing TMJ ankylosis.

Source:

British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Article:

Is dermis fat arthroplasty better than plain gap arthroplasty? A prospective randomised controlled trial

Authors:

N.N. Andrade et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en
Try: