EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

Back

Lumbopelvic manipulation proves effective as adjuvant therapy for patellofemoral pain

Patellofemoral pain syndrome Patellofemoral pain syndrome
Patellofemoral pain syndrome Patellofemoral pain syndrome

What's new?

Lumbopelvic manipulation significantly reduces knee pain in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome, especially when combined with other physical therapies.

Lumbopelvic manipulation (LPM) notably eased knee pain in patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) patients, particularly when used alongside other physical therapies, as per the outcomes of a recent  systematic review and meta-analysis. PFPS has been a leading cause of knee pain, and LPM might offer relief. A study aiming to evaluate how effective LPM is for reducing pain in PFPS patients was published in the journal “Life”.

In this study, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about LPM's effect on PFPS were searched. Researchers analyzed changes in pain scores from visual analog or numeric rating scales (VAS or NRS) in ten studies with 346 participants. The analysis showed significant pain attenuation in the LPM group when compared to the control group. Additionally, combining LPM with other physical therapies provided even greater pain relief and no adverse events were reported during the LPM treatment.

It was concluded that lumbopelvic manipulation is a safe and effective addition to treatment plans for PFPS, offering significant pain relief. It is advised that clinicians should consider integrating LPM with other therapies, like quadriceps strengthening, to enhance patient outcomes.

Source:

Life

Article:

The Effect of Lumbopelvic Manipulation for Pain Reduction in Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Authors:

Long-Huei Lin et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en
Try: