EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

Back

Risk determinants of uncontrolled PJI of knee after two-stage reimplantation

Risk determinants of uncontrolled PJI of knee after two-stage reimplantation Risk determinants of uncontrolled PJI of knee after two-stage reimplantation
Risk determinants of uncontrolled PJI of knee after two-stage reimplantation Risk determinants of uncontrolled PJI of knee after two-stage reimplantation

This research focused to examine the treatment outcomes of following two-stage knee reimplantation and classify the risk factors for uncontrolled PJI of knees.

See All

Key take away

Periprosthetic infection (PJI) following TKA poses as a serious problem, and doctors should recognize the associated risk factors to prevent its relapse. This present study found that 17 out of 70 patients developed recurrent infections after reimplantation; with wound issues, fungal species, etc. as risk determinants/factors  for the same. This can help in advising patients and physicians for a better understanding and taking caution in PJI treatment.

Background

This research focused to examine the treatment outcomes of following two-stage knee reimplantation and classify the risk factors for uncontrolled PJI of knees.

Method

All in all, seventy knees diagnosed with a PJI treated with two-stage reimplantation were retrospectively reviewed. Following reimplantation, the patients in group C i.e. controlled infection group needed no further medication or surgical treatment in 2 years. Group U patients i.e. uncontrolled infection group portrayed symptoms of active infection following the resection arthroplasty or were again infected after 2-stage reimplantation. A comparison of group C and group U was done and potential risk factors for uncontrolled PJI were investigated.

Result

At follow-up, 53 (75.7%) knees were clinically considered free from infection at the latest follow-up. The rest 17 knees (24.3%) needed extra surgical procedures after the 2-stage reimplantation. No statistically significant difference was found between the groups, considering the demographics. Group U had statistically more common wound issues (p = 0.030). Between groups C and U, pre-reimplantation C-reactive protein (CRP) was statistically different (0.44 and 1.70, p = 0.025). Fungus species was statistically more prevalent in group U than group C (p = 0.031).

Conclusion

In the included cases, the reinfection rate of our two-stage reimplantation protocol was 24.3%. Group U had statistically more common wound complications, higher pre-reimplantation CRP levels, and fungus species were than with group C. 

Source:

Knee Surgery & Related Research

Article:

Risk factors of uncontrolled periprosthetic knee joint infection after two-stage reimplantation

Authors:

Du-Han Kim et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en ru ua
Try: