The effectiveness of low-level laser therapy for nonspecific chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

Back

The effectiveness of low-level laser therapy for nonspecific chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The effectiveness of low-level laser therapy for nonspecific chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis The effectiveness of low-level laser therapy for nonspecific chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
The effectiveness of low-level laser therapy for nonspecific chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis The effectiveness of low-level laser therapy for nonspecific chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

In recent decades, low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has been widely used to relieve pain caused by different musculoskeletal disorders.

See All

Key take away

The 'range of motion', may or may not be a governing characteristic for nonspecific chronic low back pain. This review has provided well-suited current insight on low-level laser therapy (LLLT) for the treatment of this low back pain. 

Background

In recent decades, low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has been widely used to relieve pain caused by different musculoskeletal disorders. Though widely used, its reported therapeutic outcomes are varied and conflicting. Results similarly conflict regarding its usage in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP). This study investigated the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) for the treatment of NSCLBP by a systematic literature search with meta-analyses on selected studies.

Method

MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science and Cochrane Library were systematically searched from January 2000 to November 2014. Included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) written in English that compared LLLT with placebo treatment in NSCLBP patients. The efficacy effect size was estimated by the weighted mean difference (WMD). Standard random-effects meta-analysis was used, and inconsistency was evaluated by the I-squared index (I2).

Result

Of 221 studies, seven RCTs (one triple-blind, four double-blind, one single-blind, one not mentioning blinding, totaling 394 patients) met the criteria for inclusion. Based on five studies, the WMD in visual analog scale (VAS) pain outcome score after treatment was significantly lower in the LLLT group compared with placebo (WMD = -13.57 [95 % CI = -17.42, -9.72], I2 = 0 %). No significant treatment effect was identified for disability scores or spinal range of motion outcomes.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that LLLT is an effective method for relieving pain in NSCLBP patients. However, there is still a lack of evidence supporting its effect on function.

Source:

Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Dec 15;17:360

Article:

The effectiveness of low-level laser therapy for nonspecific chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors:

ZeYu Huang et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies ru en
Try: