Efficacy of off-label therapy for NAFLD :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

Back

Effectiveness of off-label therapy for NAFLD in improving biomarkers

off_label_therapy off_label_therapy
off_label_therapy off_label_therapy

A study was carried out to determine efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, vitamin E, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, and pioglitazone in people suffering from non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

See All

Key take away

Pioglitazone, Vitamin E, SGLT2 inhibitors, and GLP-1 receptor agonists are effective for treatment of NAFLD patients.

Background

A study was carried out to determine efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, vitamin E, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, and pioglitazone in people suffering from non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

Method

Databases like Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were comprehensively explored to find out randomized controlled trials that compared the impact of four different drugs in NAFLD.  In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, the drugs investigated were pioglitazone, vitamin E (δ-tocotrienol, α-tocopherol), three kinds of GLP-1 receptor agonists (dulaglutide, liraglutide, semaglutide), and four SGLT2 inhibitors (empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, tofogliflozin, ipragliflozin). As a reference, placebos were utilized.

The endpoints incorporated alteration in invasive tests [resolution of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), fibrosis score] and non-invasive tests [keratin-18, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), liver fat content, aspartate aminotransferase (AST)]. In total, 27 trials and 3,416 volunteers were included.

Result

δ-Tocotrienol showed superiority over placebo in reducing the GGT level. When compared to placebo, pioglitazone, semaglutide, and ipragliflozin elicited a considerably greater drop in the ALT level. Dapagliflozin, semaglutide, and pioglitazone displayed superiority over placebo in lowering the level of AST. Pioglitazone and tofogliflozin (vs. placebo) elicited a remarkably greater drop in keratin-18 levels. In terms of CAP reduction, liraglutide was better than placebo.

Compared to placebo, vitamin E, liraglutide, and pioglitazone elicited a considerably greater rise in NASH resolution. Regarding pairwise comparisons, pioglitazone and semaglutide showed superiority over liraglutide in minimizing the level of ALT. Semaglutide (vs. dulaglutide) triggered a greater reduction in ALT levels. In terms of reduction of AST level, semaglutide was witnessed to be better than tofogliflozin, empagliflozin, dulaglutide, and liraglutide.

Pioglitazone stimulated a better reduction in GGT level when compared to ipragliflozin. δ-Tocotrienol was noted to be superior to liraglutide in minimizing the level of GGT. Pioglitazone and tofogliflozin instigated more reduction in keratin-18 levels in comparison with dulaglutide. Regarding an increase in NASH resolution, pioglitazone was found to be superior to vitamin E.

Moreover, liraglutide therapy exhibited the highest surface under the cumulative ranking
(SUCRA) in minimizing CAP and ELF scores and improving NASH resolution while pioglitazone therapy illustrated the highest SUCRA ranking in lowering fibrosis scores and liver fat content. Tofogliflozin use showed the highest SUCRA ranking in diminishing keratin-18, while dapagliflozin use demonstrated the highest SUCRA ranking in lowering GGT level. In terms of reduction of levels of AST and ALT, semaglutide therapy possessed the highest SUCRA ranking

Conclusion

Hence, this study offered evidence for the effectiveness of pioglitazone, vitamin E, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and SGLT2 inhibitors for management of people having NAFLD.

Source:

Frontiers in Medicine

Article:

Efficacy of Off-Label Therapy for Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Improving Non-invasive and Invasive Biomarkers: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Authors:

Qian Luo et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en ru ua
Try: