Neuromodulation techniques for chronic pancreatic pain :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Chronic pancreatic pain and neurostimulation: What the latest studies reveal!

Chronic pancreatic pain Chronic pancreatic pain
Chronic pancreatic pain Chronic pancreatic pain

What's new?

rTMS and SCS show consistent effectiveness in reducing chronic pancreatic pain and opioid use, while other neuromodulation techniques yield mixed results.

Chronic pancreatic pain is one of the most severe types of visceral pain, often leading to poor treatment responses and a heavy reliance on opioids. A systematic review by Maria F Andrade et al. sought to explore the potential of neuromodulation techniques as alternative therapies for chronic pancreatic pain, given their ability to activate descending pain inhibitory systems. A literature search was carried out using Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) to identify studies on neurostimulation techniques for prolonged pancreatic discomfort.

The included studies focused on pain outcomes and opioid use. The risk of bias was examined via the Jadad scale. Findings were grouped by the target of neurostimulation (cortex, spinal cord, or peripheral nerves) and described qualitatively, including effect sizes of pain-linked outcomes.

Overall, 22 studies (1 survey, 7 randomized clinical trials [RCTs], and 14 case series) involving 257 volunteers were incorporated. Pain, measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS), numeric rating scale (NRS), and pressure pain threshold, alongside opioid consumption were the most commonly assessed endpoints.

Key findings:

  • Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS): In total, 2 RCTs showed pain reduction of 36% and 27.2% on VAS.
  • Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation: In a clinical trial, tDCS and transcranial pulsed current stimulation did not show a prominent decrease in VAS pain (χ2 = 5.87). But, 1 tDCS case documented total recovery.
  • Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) and Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: Case series and surveys revealed that 90% of volunteers experienced substantial pain relief and a reduction in opioid usage following correct implantation of spinal cord stimulators. Follow-ups ranged from months to years. However, the absence of RCTs limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions.
  • Vagal Nerve Stimulation (VNS): Despite being tested in 2 RCTs, VNS did not exhibit noticeable pain alleviation. Researchers believe the lack of statistical significance may be attributed to the small sample sizes and insufficient study power, emphasizing a need for larger trials.
  • Splanchnic Nerve Stimulation: Overall, 1 case report exhibited complete pain relief and cessation of oral morphine and fentanyl lozenges, with a 95% drop in fentanyl patch use.
  • Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS): While 1 RCT found a remarkable reduction in pain (d = 1.481) and opioid use, another showed no notable benefits. Additionally, 1 case report demonstrated pain improvement, though it was not quantitatively assessed.

Thus, rTMS and SCS were found to be the most promising neurostimulation techniques for tackling chronic pancreatic pain, showing consistent evidence of efficacy. However, the need for more robust studies, especially RCTs for SCS, was clear. The lack of significant findings for VNS and tDCS pointed to a gap in the literature, urging further investigation into these techniques. An important takeaway was the consistent trend of decreased opioid consumption across many of the included studies. Moreover, adverse effects were infrequent, making these techniques relatively safe.

Source:

Neuromodulation

Article:

Effect of Neurostimulation on Chronic Pancreatic Pain: A Systematic Review

Authors:

Maria F Andrade et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en
Try: