Study determines whether antibiotic loaded bone cement reduce periprosthetic joint infection risk | All the latest summaries on the portal Medznat.ru. :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Study determines whether antibiotic loaded bone cement reduce periprosthetic joint infection risk

Study determines whether antibiotic loaded bone cement reduce periprosthetic joint infection risk Study determines whether antibiotic loaded bone cement reduce periprosthetic joint infection risk
Study determines whether antibiotic loaded bone cement reduce periprosthetic joint infection risk Study determines whether antibiotic loaded bone cement reduce periprosthetic joint infection risk

This article aimed to perform a narrative review of recent literature to determine whether ALBC minimizes PJI risk in primary TKA.

See All

Key take away

One of the most severe complications of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is PJI (periprosthetic joint infection). To minimize PJI risk, some surgeons use ALBC (antibiotic loaded bone cement) in primary TKA, but others do not. However, the routine use of ALBC in primary TKA is controversial. The study results depicted that the cautious use of ALBC is recommended perhaps only in patients at high risk of infection (diabetics, immunocompromised, morbid obesity, and patients with a history of fracture or infection around their knee).

Background

This article aimed to perform a narrative review of recent literature to determine whether ALBC minimizes PJI risk in primary TKA.

Method

A Cochrane Library and PubMed (MEDLINE) search related to the role ALBC in primary TKA was analyzed. The only language searched was English. Scientific meeting abstracts and other sources of evidence were excluded. The primary criteria for selection were articles that were focused on ALBC's role in primary TKA.

Result

One meta-analysis depicted that in primary TKA, the prophylactic application of ALBC is not effective in preventing PJI. According to two systematic reviews, the ALBC does not minimize the prevalence of PJI in primary TKA. So, they consider it an unnecessary expense for health systems.

One of these systematic reviews illustrated that those hospital systems that perform 1000 primary TKA operations per year can save between $155,000 and $310,000 per year if they always use plain cement. A prospective study demonstrated that in patients with diabetes mellitus who are treated with primary TKA, cement impregnated with cefuroxime is effective in preventing PJI.

Conclusion

Cautious use of ALBC is recommended only in patients at high risk of infection.

Source:

HOSPITAL PRACTICE

Article:

Antibiotic-loaded bone cement in primary total knee arthroplasty: does it reduce the risk of periprosthetic joint infection?

Authors:

E. Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en ru ua
Try: