EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

Back

Comparison of romosozumab with teriparatide in postmenopausal women with low bone mass

Comparison of romosozumab with teriparatide in postmenopausal women with low bone mass Comparison of romosozumab with teriparatide in postmenopausal women with low bone mass
Comparison of romosozumab with teriparatide in postmenopausal women with low bone mass Comparison of romosozumab with teriparatide in postmenopausal women with low bone mass

Romosozumab, a monoclonal antibody helps to increase bone formation and reduce bone resorption, and therefore has promising results for bone volume regulation. 

See All

Key take away

Bone‐forming or anabolic therapies can help to decrease the bone fracture risk for example in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. In this study, romosozumab resulted in significant and rapid improvements in density and mass at spine and hip as compared to teriparatide. These advantageous effects, perceived after 12 months of treatment, comprised of improvements in the trabecular and cortical compartments.

Background

Romosozumab, a monoclonal antibody helps to increase bone formation and reduce bone resorption, and therefore has promising results for bone volume regulation. In an earlier study, romosozumab found to increase areal BMD at the lumbar spine and total hip compared with placebo, alendronate, and teriparatide in postmenopausal women with low bone mass.

In this international, randomized study, the effect of romosozumab on lumbar spine and hip volumetric BMD (vBMD) and BMC at month 12 as evaluated by QCT in patients  and has been compared with teroparatide.

Method

Three hundred and sixty seven patients were divided into groups who were given teriparatide (20 µg once daily), and  romosozumab subcutaneously (210 mg once-a-month) and a placebo achieved. The QCT measurements were implemented at the lumbar spine (mean of L1 and L2 entire vertebral bodies, without the posterior processes) and hip.

Result

Romosozumab considerably increased integral vBMD and BMC at the lumbar spine and total hip from baseline as compared with placebo and teriparatide an year following the treatment. Romosozumab and teriparatide depicted similar improvements in trabecular vertebral vBMD. The cortical vertebral vBMD gains were higher with romosozumab than with teriparatide (13.7% versus 5.7%). The trabecular hip vBMD gains were considerably larger with romosozumab as compared with teriparatide (10.8% versus 4.2%), however were similar for cortical vBMD. At both the hip and spine, the cortical BMC gains were greater with romosozumab than with teriparatide.

Conclusion

The outcomes of this study encourage the continued clinical analysis of romosozumab as a promising therapy to rapidly decrease the risk of fracture in the ongoing phase 3 studies. 

Source:

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Article:

Effects of Romosozumab Compared With Teriparatide on Bone Density and Mass at the Spine and Hip in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mass

Authors:

Harry K. Genant et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies ru en
Try: