Rupatadine's efficacy and safety for perennial allergic rhinitis :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Safety and efficacy of rupatadine to treat perennial allergic rhinitis

Safety and efficacy of rupatadine to treat perennial allergic rhinitis Safety and efficacy of rupatadine to treat perennial allergic rhinitis
Safety and efficacy of rupatadine to treat perennial allergic rhinitis Safety and efficacy of rupatadine to treat perennial allergic rhinitis

This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, comparative study was carried out to examine the efficacy and safety of rupatadine in 330 patients diagnosed with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR).

See All

Key take away

Rupatadine fumarate is an effective and safe therapeutic choice for the management of perennial allergic rhinitis patients. Also, rupatadine showed superiority over bepotastine besilate in controlling morning symptoms.

Background

This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, comparative study was carried out to examine the efficacy and safety of rupatadine in 330 patients diagnosed with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR).

Method

In this multicenter study, participants were randomized to the rupatadine group (n=108), bepotastine group (reference drug, n=111) and placebo group (n=111) for four weeks. A decline in the morning and evening symptoms from baseline after four weeks of therapy was the major efficacy endpoint. In addition, the safety and tolerability of therapy were assessed as per a self-reported incidence and type of side effects at each visit.

Result

Rupatadine demonstrated a considerable decline in symptoms at morning and evening evaluations, in both total symptom score (5TSS, -5.69) and four nasal total symptom scale (4NTSS, -4.74) in comparison with placebo.

In the morning assessments, there was a remarkable drop from baseline for 5TSS (-65.4%) and 4NTSS (-63.7%) with rupatadine in comparison with placebo. A substantial drop of 5TSS (-63.2%) and 4NTSS (-61.6%) in the evening assessments was noted for the rupatadine recipients.

In comparison with bepotastine, rupatadine illustrated more decrease in the morning symptoms at four weeks. When individual symptoms were evaluated with a 12-hour reflective mean daily symptom score, rupatadine displayed better efficacy compared to placebo in rhinorrhea and sneezing. Regarding safety, no statistically significant rate of adverse events was reported.

Conclusion

In patients with PAR, rupatadine led to a greater decline in the severity of ocular and nasal symptoms than placebo. It is an effective and safe pharmacological option and maybe a better choice over bepotastine for managing morning symptoms.

Source:

The Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology

Article:

Efficacy and safety of rupatadine fumarate in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis: A multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, bridging study in Koreans

Authors:

Tae-Bin Won et al.

Comments (1)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en ru ua
Try: