Lefamulin efficacy and safety for pneumonia :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Safety and efficacy assessment of lefamulin in patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia

Safety and efficacy assessment of lefamulin in patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia Safety and efficacy assessment of lefamulin in patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia
Safety and efficacy assessment of lefamulin in patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia Safety and efficacy assessment of lefamulin in patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia

This pooled analysis of two studies (Lefamulin Evaluation Against Pneumonia [LEAP] trials) examined lefamulin's overall safety and efficacy in individuals having comorbidities typical in the management of CABP.

See All

Key take away

Lefamulin may be a promising empiric monotherapy option for people with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP), including people at risk for poor outcomes due to age or several comorbidities. 

Background

This pooled analysis of two studies (Lefamulin Evaluation Against Pneumonia [LEAP] trials) examined lefamulin's overall safety and efficacy in individuals having comorbidities typical in the management of CABP.

Method

In one study (LEAP 1), patients with CABP were given intravenous (IV) lefamulin (first-in-class pleuromutilin antibiotic) 150 mg (once every 12 hours) for 5 to 7 days or; moxifloxacin 400 mg (once a day) for a week, with optional IV-to-oral change if predefined improvement criteria were not fulfilled. In the second study (LEAP 2), CABP people received oral administration of 600 mg lefamulin (once every 12 hours) for five days or 400 mg moxifloxacin (once a day) for a week.

The early clinical response (ECR) at 96 ± 24 hours after the first study drug dose was assessed. The investigator’s assessment of clinical response (IACR) of the patient at 5 to 10 days after the final dose was also evaluated. A 10% non-inferiority margin was used for pooled analyses of the total population.

Result

Out of the total, 646 patients were in the lefamulin group and 643 in the moxifloxacin group. Lefamulin was non-inferior to moxifloxacin for ECR, as shown in Figure 1:


High IACR rates of success at 5 to 10 days after the last dose were observed. Patient subgroups, incorporating people with older age, diabetes, a history of cardiovascular diseases (for example, high blood pressure, congestive heart failure, or irregular heartbeat) or chronic lung diseases (for example, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma), raised liver enzymes, or kidney dysfunction (mild-to-moderate) demonstrated high efficacy with both lefamulin and moxifloxacin. There were no new safety signals.

Conclusion

Lefamulin may be a significant IV or oral therapy that can be used as a substitute to fluoroquinolones or macrolides for CABP management and in patients with higher age or comorbidities. The antibiotic was well-tolerated irrespective of the route of administration (oral or IV). 

Source:

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

Article:

Lefamulin efficacy and safety in a pooled phase 3 clinical trial population with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia and common clinical comorbidities

Authors:

Thomas M. File Jr. et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en ru ua
Try: