Remote electronic fetal monitoring for maternal emotional health :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Remote vs. traditional electronic fetal monitoring for improving maternal emotional well-being

Pregnancy Pregnancy
Pregnancy Pregnancy

This multicenter prospective cohort study aimed to compare the accessibility and effectiveness of remote electronic fetal monitoring (REFM) as a substitute for traditional electronic fetal monitoring (TEFM).

See All

Key take away

Remote electronic fetal monitoring significantly improves pregnancy outcomes and reduces maternal anxiety, serving as a valuable and innovative alternative to traditional monitoring methods.

Background

This multicenter prospective cohort study aimed to compare the accessibility and effectiveness of remote electronic fetal monitoring (REFM) as a substitute for traditional electronic fetal monitoring (TEFM).

Method

This study enrolled 2900 pregnant women. Of these, 800 women used REFM, with 760 completing assessments for anxiety and depression via the devices over 1 month. The control group had 2100 volunteers who did not employ REFM. Furthermore, 80 women utilized both REFM + TEFM, and their rates of curve coincidence were assessed through curve fitting. The pregnancy results for both groups, average curve coincidence rates between REFM and TEFM, along with the anxiety and depression scores were considered in the primary outcomes.

Result

Among the 760 pregnant females who completed the evaluations, the average self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) scores prior to and following one month of use are displayed in Table 1:

A noteworthy decrease in SAS scores was observed (P = 0.005) as opposed to the SDS scores. Furthermore, there was a significant difference in the occurrence of adverse pregnancy outcomes, chiefly neonatal asphyxia, between those who used REFM and those who did not. The results indicated complete agreement between the two methods, with a coincidence rate of 79.45% ± 12.64% on an average in women utilizing REFM + TEFM.

Conclusion

REFM enhances pregnancy outcomes, aligns well with TEFM, and reduces anxiety in pregnant women, demonstrating its comparability, accessibility, and clinical utility.

Source:

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Article:

Fungibility, accessibility and clinical utility of remote electronic fetal monitoring in improving maternal emotional status compared with traditional method: A multicenter prospective cohort analysis

Authors:

Yu Pan et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en
Try: