Saphenous nerve injury during hamstring tendons harvest: Does the incision matter? A systematic review | All the latest summaries on the portal Medznat.ru. :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Saphenous nerve injury during hamstring tendons harvest: Does the incision matter? A systematic review

Saphenous nerve injury during hamstring tendons harvest: Does the incision matter? A systematic review Saphenous nerve injury during hamstring tendons harvest: Does the incision matter? A systematic review
Saphenous nerve injury during hamstring tendons harvest: Does the incision matter? A systematic review Saphenous nerve injury during hamstring tendons harvest: Does the incision matter? A systematic review

Infrapatellar branch of saphenous nerve injury is a common complication following hamstring graft harvest during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

See All

Key take away

As per this study, the kind of incision has been reported to matter for the iatrogenic nerve damage and in the routinely clinical damage. Also, there was lower rate of neurological impairment embracing an oblique incision.

Background

Infrapatellar branch of saphenous nerve injury is a common complication following hamstring graft harvest during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The direction of skin incision performed at proximal tibial metaphysis may affect the rate of iatrogenic nerve damage. Aim of the present systematic review was to evaluate evidence that would substantiate the adoption of one incision over another for hamstring graft harvesting.

Method

The available literature was systematically screened searching studies dealing with iatrogenic injury to the saphenous nerve after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. A search was performed using the keywords “Saphenous” and “Infrapatellar branch” in combination with “Anterior cruciate ligament”, “arthroscopy” and “hamstrings”, supplying no limits regard the publication year. Coleman methodological score was performed in all the retained articles.

Result

Five articles matched the inclusion criteria. There were two randomized controlled trials, one prospective comparative study and two retrospective comparative series. Poor methodological quality was found overall. A vertical incision was found to significantly affect the presence of hypoesthesia and the extent of the area of sensory loss in three articles; no difference was registered in one, and a trend towards a lower rate of iatrogenic nerve damage using an oblique incision was found in the remaining one, without any statistical significance.

Conclusion

Although the low methodological quality of the analyzed studies does not permit to draw definitive conclusions, the anatomical course of the nerve along with the results obtained in the available studies seems to suggest lower rate of neurological impairment adopting an oblique incision. This kind of incision may therefore be preferred in the routine clinical practice.

Source:

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc

Article:

Saphenous nerve injury during hamstring tendons harvest: Does the incision matter? A systematic review

Authors:

A. Ruffilli et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies ru en
Try: