EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

Back

Post hoc study evaluates the safety and efficacy of lasmiditan in migraine patients

Post hoc study evaluates the safety and efficacy of lasmiditan in migraine patients Post hoc study evaluates the safety and efficacy of lasmiditan in migraine patients
Post hoc study evaluates the safety and efficacy of lasmiditan in migraine patients Post hoc study evaluates the safety and efficacy of lasmiditan in migraine patients

A post hoc analysis was conducted to assess if the common migraine comorbidities impact the safety and efficacy of lasmiditan (a 5-hydroxytryptamine/serotonin receptor 1F [5-HT1F ] receptor agonist), approved in the United States for the acute management of patients with migraine.

See All

Key take away

As found in a post hoc analysis, the safety and efficacy of lasmiditan for treating individual attacks of migraine were independent of the comorbid conditions.

Background

A post hoc analysis was conducted to assess if the common migraine comorbidities impact the safety and efficacy of lasmiditan (a 5-hydroxytryptamine/serotonin receptor 1F [5-HT1F ] receptor agonist), approved in the United States for the acute management of patients with migraine.

Method

In double-blind Phase III (SPARTAN and SAMURAI) clinical trials, migraine patients were randomly allocated to orally administered 50 mg lasmiditan (SPARTAN only), 100 mg, 200 mg, or placebo. Considering the literature review of common migraine comorbidities, the following comorbidity groups were created: Anxiety, bronchial, allergy, cardiac, fatigue, depression, hormonal, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal/pain, obesity, neurological, vascular, and sleep.

The treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and efficacy were evaluated utilizing pooled results to compare individuals with or without common migraine comorbidity. To compare the therapeutic groups, the p-values were measured for treatment-by-subgroup interaction. This was done based on logistic regression with treatment-by-comorbidity condition status (Yes versus No) defined as the interaction term. Study, comorbidity condition status (Yes versus No), treatment group were defined as the covariates. Based on the comorbidity status, the differential treatment effect was also examined.

Result

No relevant proof of a lasmiditan-driven lasmiditan compared to placebo differential treatment impact based on Yes versus No comorbidity subgroup was noted for TEAEs and efficacy evaluations in the treatment-by-subgroup interaction analyses. This was noted for all the comorbidity groups (except fatigue).

There is a requisition of further studies to validate these post hoc, exploratory findings. This is because the low number of patients in the “Yes” Subgroup for several Comorbidity Groups could have adversely impacted the current assessments as well as because of other limitations inherent in the exploratory analyses.

Conclusion

For managing patients suffering from migraine attacks, the safety and efficacy of lasmiditan were found to be independent of comorbid conditions.

Source:

Current Medical Research and Opinion

Article:

Lasmiditan in patients with common migraine comorbidities: a post hoc efficacy and safety analysis of two Phase 3 randomized clinical trials

Authors:

David B. Clemow et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en ru
Try: