Recommendations for chronic low back pain :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Management of chronic low back pain as per high-quality clinical practice guidelines

Management of chronic low back pain as per high-quality clinical practice guidelines Management of chronic low back pain as per high-quality clinical practice guidelines
Management of chronic low back pain as per high-quality clinical practice guidelines Management of chronic low back pain as per high-quality clinical practice guidelines

The recommendations for the management of chronic low back pain management in primary care keeping in view the high-quality and up-to-date clinical practice guidelines have been reviewed in this study.

See All

Key take away

Concerning the procedural quality of clinical practice guidelines, partial progress was noted. Among lately published/revised clinical guidelines for chronic low back pain management in primary medical care, only a few were believed to have high-quality evidence.

Background

The recommendations for the management of chronic low back pain management in primary care keeping in view the high-quality and up-to-date clinical practice guidelines have been reviewed in this study.

Method

Database search included exploring the PubMed, EMBASE, PEDro, Google Scholar, CINHAL, Government and Scientific Association websites. Three investigators screened the documents as per the inclusion criteria. The retrieved documents were reviewed via Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument.

Result

Ten Clinical practice Guidelines fulfilled the inclusion criteria out of 3055 records. These guidelines had moderately variable quality. Four clinical practice guidelines were regarded as "excellent" and then they were extracted and briefed. Due to incomplete indexing or publication bias, some practice guidelines may be absent. As noted, physicians should be aware that among the recently published/updated guidelines, only a few were found to have high quality.

Increasing evidence recommends the efficacy of self-management for improving low back pain outcomes. Physical therapies are suggested for better low back pain outcomes while many physical modalities like laser therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and ultrasound are not suggested. Psychological therapies are suggested and should be incorporated as part of a broader therapeutic plan.

Conclusion

Various AGREE II domains portrayed low scores. Especially the "applicability" and "monitoring and auditing criteria" were the most vulnerable domains to alterations in the future.

Source:

Disability and Rehabilitation

Article:

Evidence for managing chronic low back pain in primary care: a review of recommendations from high-quality clinical practice guidelines

Authors:

Roberto Meroni et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en ru ua
Try: