Low-level laser therapy is not effective in reducing orthodontic pain | All the latest summaries on the portal Medznat.ru. :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Low-level laser therapy is not effective in reducing orthodontic pain

Low-level laser therapy is not effective in reducing orthodontic pain Low-level laser therapy is not effective in reducing orthodontic pain
Low-level laser therapy is not effective in reducing orthodontic pain Low-level laser therapy is not effective in reducing orthodontic pain

A two-arm parallel-group, randomized, single-center, single-blind non-inferiority placebo-controlled clinical trial aimed to investigate the effectiveness of LLLT in mitigating spontaneous and chewing pain following initial orthodontic archwire placement.

See All

Key take away

From a recent study on 26 orthodontic patients in need of fixed orthodontic appliance treatment to decrowd severe maxillary anterior teeth crowding, it was deduced that LLLT (low-level laser therapy) is not effective in alleviating pain following initial orthodontic archwire placement.

Background

A two-arm parallel-group, randomized, single-center, single-blind non-inferiority placebo-controlled clinical trial aimed to investigate the effectiveness of LLLT in mitigating spontaneous and chewing pain following initial orthodontic archwire placement.

Method

Overall, 26 orthodontic patients (mean age 20.07 ± 3.13 years) with maxillary LII (Little’s Irregularity Index) of 7 mm or more that indicates first maxillary premolars extraction and no intake of medications were recruited in this analysis. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to either LLL group (n=13) or placebo group (n=13).

In the LLL group, subjects were given a single LLL dose (wavelength 830 nm, energy 2 J/point) in four points (2 palatal, 2 buccal) for each maxillary anterior tooth root. In the placebo group, the subjects received the same laser application procedure without emitting the laser beam.

After 1, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h of treatment application, participants were requested to score spontaneous and chewing pain intensity by filling out a questionnaire with a 100-mm VAS (Visual Analogue Scale).

To compare the mean pain scores for both spontaneous and chewing pain at each studied time point, an independent t-test was utilized. The results of the 26 patients were statistically analyzed since no dropout occurred.

Result

In the LLL group, the pain scores in all studied time points were less than their counterparts in the placebo group for both spontaneous and chewing pain. However, for each studied time point, no statistically significant difference was witnessed between the two groups. After 72 h, in the LLL group, the VAS score for chewing pain was found to be less compared to the placebo group as shown in the following table:

Conclusion

In orthodontic patients, LLLT is not effective in reducing pain following initial orthodontic archwire placement.

Source:

BMC Oral Health

Article:

Low-level laser therapy effectiveness in reducing initial orthodontic archwire placement pain in premolars extraction cases: a single-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial

Authors:

Mohammad Moaffak A. AlSayed Hasan et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en ru
Try: