Haematoma block safe for analgesia through closed reductions of distal radius fractures | All the latest summaries on the portal Medznat.ru. :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Haematoma block safe for analgesia through closed reductions of distal radius fractures

Haematoma block safe for analgesia through closed reductions of distal radius fractures Haematoma block safe for analgesia through closed reductions of distal radius fractures
Haematoma block safe for analgesia through closed reductions of distal radius fractures Haematoma block safe for analgesia through closed reductions of distal radius fractures

A retrospective mono-centric study was carried out to determine the safety and complication rates of HB for closed reduction of surgically managed distal radius fractures.

See All

Key take away

For distal radius fractures, the haematoma block (HB) is effectively utilized to yield pain relief before a painful closed reduction manoeuvres. But, the invasive approach of the procedure is still debatable regarding the use of HB in increasing the infection risk than standard analgesia.

As per the outcomes of this study, the complication rates did not vary amongst HB and standard analgesia treated patients. Also, more complications were witnessed in younger patients after distal radius fractures.

Background

A retrospective mono-centric study was carried out to determine the safety and complication rates of HB for closed reduction of surgically managed distal radius fractures.

Method

Overall, 176 distal radius fractures in 170 subjects who underwent casting and closed reduction were incorporated in this analysis. They had definitive surgical care over 2 years. The patients were either given an HB (transcutaneous injection of local anaesthetic into the fracture haematoma) or intravenous analgesia (IA) prior to the closed reduction.

For the HB, about 10 ml of local anaesthetic, 2% prilocain (20 mg/ml) was efficiently drawn up into a sterile syringe. The site of fracture was recognized by the palpation of the dorsal wrist. Using a disinfecting solution, the dorsal wrist was suitably sterilized and draped. Transcutaneous insertion of the needle into the fracture area at a 30° angle was done.

The accurate location of the needle was validated by utilizing a C-arm image intensifier. This was followed by aspiration of the fracture haematoma. About 5-10 ml of prilocain was then appropriately infused into the fracture haematoma itself and into the superficial sensory branch of the radial nerve, as depicted in the following figure:


Participants were then examined for minor and major issues over a 4 years follow-up.

Result

All in all, 42 (23.9%) and 134 (76.1%) distal radius fractures were treated via the HB and IA. The number of complications has been portrayed in the following table:


Although gender and fracture type did not affect the complication rates. But, younger patients were found to have a higher complication rate than older (p = 0.035).

Conclusion

The hesitation concerning clinicians regarding creating an open distal radius fracture from a closed distal radius fracture cannot be sustained. It has greater complication rates and should be abandoned.

Source:

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

Article:

Haematoma block: a safe method for pre-surgical reduction of distal radius fractures

Authors:

Tazio Maleitzke et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en ru
Try: