Efficacy of Sodium Carboxymethylcellulose versus Sodium Hyaluronate for Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection | All the latest summaries on the portal Medznat.ru. :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Efficacy of Sodium Carboxymethylcellulose versus Sodium Hyaluronate for Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Efficacy of Sodium Carboxymethylcellulose versus Sodium Hyaluronate for Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Efficacy of Sodium Carboxymethylcellulose versus Sodium Hyaluronate for Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Efficacy of Sodium Carboxymethylcellulose versus Sodium Hyaluronate for Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Efficacy of Sodium Carboxymethylcellulose versus Sodium Hyaluronate for Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

To study the efficacy of sodium carboxymethylcellulose (SCMC) 1.0% compared to that of Sodium hyaluronate (SH) 0.4% in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of gastric neoplasms.

See All

Key take away

The solutions used for submucosal injection  helps to isolate the lesion from the muscularis propria to permit overall resection of the gastric lesion. Both the Sodium hyaluronate and sodium carboxymethylcellulose injections used in this prospective randomized controlled trial had comparable outcomes for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Background

To study the efficacy of sodium carboxymethylcellulose (SCMC) 1.0% compared to that of Sodium hyaluronate (SH) 0.4% in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of gastric neoplasms.

Method

Overall 60 patients were divided into SH groups and SCMC groups with 30 patients in each group.  The duration of ESD was regarded as primary end point. En bloc and starting resection rates, hemostases, injectant quantity, ease of treatment (VAS, visual analog scale), number of adverse events, and percentage of ulcer healing after 8 weeks of the ESD procedure were considered as secondary endpoints.

Result

The duration of ESD did not significantly vary between the two groups. No differences between the SH groups and SCMC groups concerning any secondary endpoints found. There were no serious adverse events.

Conclusion

Both the groups had comparable outcomes concerning duration, treatment, and ease and safety of gastric ESD treatment. 

Source:

Digestion

Article:

Efficacy of Sodium Carboxymethylcellulose Compared to Sodium Hyaluronate as Submucosal Injectant for Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors:

Jun Nakamura et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en ru ua
Try: