Photobiomodulation for erosive oral lichen planus :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Comparison of Photobiomodulation and Corticosteroids for erosive oral lichen planus

Oral lichen planus Oral lichen planus
Oral lichen planus Oral lichen planus

Photobiomodulation (PBM) is emerging as a potential alternative treatment, offering benefits such as pain relief, inflammation reduction, and tissue healing without the disadvantages connected with traditional steroid use.

This randomized clinical study compared the effects of PBM versus triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% used as topical therapy for erosive oral lichen planus (OLP).

See All

Key take away

Photobiomodulation is a safe and effective therapy with no apparent side effects for the treatment of erosive oral lichen planus (long-lasting and painful ulceration of the skin and mucosal surfaces) lesions.

Background

Photobiomodulation (PBM) is emerging as a potential alternative treatment, offering benefits such as pain relief, inflammation reduction, and tissue healing without the disadvantages connected with traditional steroid use.

This randomized clinical study compared the effects of PBM versus triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% used as topical therapy for erosive oral lichen planus (OLP).

Method

Forty-four patients with oral OLP were assigned to one of two groups (22 patients in each group:

  • PBM group: Patients received a total of 10 sittings of laser therapy (980 nm diode laser; 300 mW output power) two times per week for overall 5 weeks.
  • Control/ Placebo group: Patients received topical triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% three times every day + oral miconazole gel one time daily for 4 weeks.

The pain, clinical scores, and biochemical evaluation of the salivary malondialdehyde levels at the baseline, at 6 weeks, and 12 weeks were done after the dental surgery. Mann–Whitney test was used to analyze all the documented data and compare the two groups based on study parameters (pain, size of lesion, and salivary malondialdehyde levels). Within each group, comparisons across the three time periods were conducted using the Friedman test, followed by post hoc testing.

Result

Both groups demonstrated notable improvements in pain levels and clinical scores, with no noteworthy statistical variance between them. Additionally, malondialdehyde levels considerably improved for these groups without any significant difference.

Conclusion

PBM holds promise as a therapeutic approach for treating erosive oral lichen planus, offering potential advantages over steroid therapy without the associated side effects. Additionally, salivary malondialdehyde levels could serve as a biomarker to estimate the grievousness of the disease and investigate the therapy response.

Source:

BMC Oral Health

Article:

Photobiomodulation versus corticosteroid in the management of erosive oral lichen planus: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Authors:

Reem Kamal Mohamed et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en ru ua
Try: