Aggressive vs Moderate fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Comparison of moderate vs. aggressive fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis

acute pancreatitis acute pancreatitis
acute pancreatitis acute pancreatitis

This study examined aggressive and moderate fluid resuscitation for the management of acute pancreatitis.

See All

Key take away

In individuals presenting with acute pancreatitis, the use of early aggressive fluid resuscitation led to a greater incidence of fluid overload without improvements in the clinical outcomes.

Background

This study examined aggressive and moderate fluid resuscitation for the management of acute pancreatitis.

Method

In this randomized trial, acute pancreatitis-affected subjects were randomly allocated at 18 centers to get goal-directed aggressive or moderate resuscitation using lactated Ringer's solution. A 20 ml bolus per kilogram of body weight, subsequently followed by 3 ml per kilogram every hour, made up aggressive fluid resuscitation. On the other hand, moderate fluid resuscitation comprised of a bolus of 10 ml per kilogram in people having hypovolemia or no bolus in people having normovolemia, subsequently followed by 1.5 ml per kilogram per hour in all people in this group.

At 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours, an assessment of participants was done. Fluid resuscitation was modified based on the clinical condition of each patient. The key endpoint was the development of severe pancreatitis or moderately severe pancreatitis while the patient was hospitalized. Fluid overload was the primary safety endpoint.

Result

The interim analysis comprised 249 patients in total. Without a considerable difference in the occurrence of moderately severe or severe pancreatitis (17.3% in the moderate-resuscitation arm and 22.1% in the aggressive-resuscitation arm; adjusted relative risk, 1.30), the trial was terminated due to between-group differences in the safety endpoints.

Notably, 20.5% of patients who got vigorous resuscitation experienced fluid overload, compared to 6.3% of patients who got moderate resuscitation (adjusted relative risk, 2.85). In the aggressive-resuscitation arm, the median hospital stays lasted six days, whereas, in the moderate-resuscitation arm, it lasted five days.

Conclusion

Compared to aggressive fluid resuscitation, moderate fluid resuscitation with goal-directed therapy is better for acute pancreatitis management.

Source:

The New England Journal of Medicine

Article:

Aggressive or Moderate Fluid Resuscitation in Acute Pancreatitis

Authors:

Enrique de-Madaria et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en ru ua
Try: