Risedronate gastro-resistant for osteoporosis :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Risedronate gastro-resistant vs. other bisphosphonates for osteoporosis

Risedronate gastro-resistant vs. other bisphosphonates for osteoporosis Risedronate gastro-resistant vs. other bisphosphonates for osteoporosis
Risedronate gastro-resistant vs. other bisphosphonates for osteoporosis Risedronate gastro-resistant vs. other bisphosphonates for osteoporosis

What's new?

Risedronate gastro-resistant therapy is superior to other bisphosphonates in minimizing the incidence of fractures in people with osteoporosis.

Compared to other oral bisphosphonates, administration of risedronate gastro-resistant (GR) exhibited a reduced occurrence of fractures in females diagnosed with osteoporosis, as deduced from a study published in Osteoporosis International. Using a retrospective observational design, Friederike Thomasius et al. carried out a study for quantifying and comparing fracture rates and economic outcomes in osteoporosis females prescribed risedronate gastro-resistant vs. other oral bisphosphonates.

Analysis of claims from females having osteoporosis was done. Participants were segregated into 2 cohorts on the basis of the first oral bisphosphonate noted (index date) and matched 1:1 on the basis of characteristics of participants. After the index date, participants were inspected for ≥ two years. Comparison of fracture rates, medical care costs, medical care resource utilization, and adherence and persistence to the treatment was carried out. Overall, 2726 participants were included in each group (median age 60 years).

Compared to other cohort, the GR cohort exhibited reduced  occurrence of fractures for any fracture sites (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 0.83) and spine fractures (IRR: 0.71). At two years, the rate of medication discontinuation was higher for the GR cohort vs. other cohort. In the case of the GR cohort, the time to 1st  fracture was delayed, reaching statistical significance after thirty-six months. In the GR cohort, fewer hospitalizations (lower utilization of inpatient services) occurred, translating into less hospitalization costs per patient per year, as shown in Table 1:


Despite their lower persistence, people given risedronate GR were related to a reduced occurrence of fractures than people given other oral bisphosphonates, which can be interpreted by the fact that the GR formulation is absorbed even when consumed along with food. While administering risedronate GR, fasting is not needed. This highly convenient form of dosing might interpret its improved efficacy.

Source:

Osteoporosis International

Article:

Fracture rates and economic outcomes in patients with osteoporosis prescribed risedronate gastro-resistant versus other oral bisphosphonates: a claims data analysis

Authors:

Friederike Thomasius et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en ru ua
Try: