Over-the-scope vs. through-the-scope clips for peptic ulcer :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Over-the-scope vs. through-the-scope clips: Which is more effective for peptic ulcer bleeding?

Peptic ulcer bleeding Peptic ulcer bleeding
Peptic ulcer bleeding Peptic ulcer bleeding

What's new?

For suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeding management, over-the-scope clips have higher technical and overall clinical success rates than through-the-scope clips.

In a randomized controlled trial, over-the-scope clips outperformed through-the-scope clips in terms of technical and overall clinical success rates in people suffering from suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeding. For first-line endoscopic therapy of acute peptic ulcer bleeding, researchers compared the efficacy of through-the-scope clips with over-the-scope clips.

In this international, multi-center study, volunteers who had upper gastrointestinal bleeding were incorporated. Subjects with Forrest Ia-IIb gastroduodenal peptic ulcer were randomly allocated to receive either through-the-scope clips or over-the-scope-clip therapy. Thirty-day rebleeding, technical success, and overall clinical success rates (characterized as technical success without proof of thirty-day rebleeding) were the major endpoints.

Out of 251 individuals screened, 112 patients were randomly assigned to receive therapy with the through-the-scope clips (n = 51) or the over-the-scope clip (n = 61). Technical success was attained in 98.4% (60/61) of volunteers treated with over-the-scope clip and in 78.4% (40/51) of people treated with through-the-scope clips, respectively. Failure of through-the-scope clips was associated with posterior duodenal wall location (3/11), large-size visible bleeding vessel (1/11), and fibrotic peptic ulcer (7/11).

After achieving technical success, 1.7% (1/60) and 5.0% (2/40) of the patients treated with the over-the-scope clip and through-the-scope clips had 30-day rebleeding, respectively. In the over-the-scope clip group, the overall clinical success rate was 96.7% (59/61) as opposed to 74.5% (38/51) in the through-the-scope clips group. As first-line endoscopic therapy for acute peptic ulcer bleeding, over-the-scope clips exhibited superior efficacy as compared to through-the-scope clips.

Source:

Thieme

Article:

Higher efficacy of over-the-scope clips compared to through-the-scope clips for first-line endoscopic treatment of acute peptic ulcer bleeding: results of an international, multi-center, randomized controlled trial

Authors:

P. Soriani et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en ru ua
Try: