m-PRP vs. m-HA injections for knee osteoarthritis :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

m-PRP injections are superior to m-HA injections to treat knee osteoarthritis

Multiple-platelet-rich plasma Multiple-platelet-rich plasma
Multiple-platelet-rich plasma Multiple-platelet-rich plasma

What's new?

For knee osteoarthritis, multiple injections of platelet-rich plasma are effective at reducing pain, enhancing joint function, and improving quality of life when compared to multiple injections of hyaluronic acid.

In comparison with multiple hyaluronic acid (m-HA) injections, multiple platelet-rich plasma (m-PRP) injections were significantly more effective for pain alleviation at 3-month and 12-month follow-ups and could profoundly enhance knee function as measured by the EuroQol visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) scores, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, and VAS scores in knee osteoarthritis patients, as per a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Researchers compared the clinical efficacy of m-HA vs m-PRP injections to manage osteoarthritis of the knee. To compare m-PRP and m-HA injections, relevant clinical trials were explored using bibliographic databases such as Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and Medline. The postoperative VAS, WOMAC, IKDC, or EQ-VAS ratings from 14 randomized controlled trials with 1512 subjects were included in this study.

The group receiving intra-articular m-PRP injections had reduced VAS scores at the 3-month (weight mean differences [WMD] = -0.25) and 12-month (WMD = -0.64) follow-ups than the group receiving intra-articular m-HA injections. Additionally, the m-PRP injection group had reduced WOMAC ratings at the 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-ups (WMD = -1.23, -5.34, -11.02, and -7.69, respectively).

Additionally, the group receiving m-PRP injections had greater IKDC scores at the 3-month (WMD = 7.45) and 6-month (WMD = 5.06) follow-ups contrasted with the group receiving m-HA injections. More extensive studies and long-term follow-ups are still required to fully understand the long-term negative effects of m-PRP injections for knee osteoarthritis.

Source:

Journal of Personalized Medicine

Article:

Multiple Injections of Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Hyaluronic Acid for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Current Evidence in Randomized Controlled Trials

Authors:

Shang Li et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en ru
Try: