Locked plate and Intramedullary nailing are equally effective in treating distal tibial fractures | All the latest medical news on the portal Medznat.ru. :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Locked plate and Intramedullary nailing are equally effective in treating distal tibial fractures

Locked plate and Intramedullary nailing are equally effective in treating distal tibial fractures Locked plate and Intramedullary nailing are equally effective in treating distal tibial fractures
Locked plate and Intramedullary nailing are equally effective in treating distal tibial fractures Locked plate and Intramedullary nailing are equally effective in treating distal tibial fractures

What's new?

The radiological and clinical outcomes of the locked plate and intramedullary nailing surgical approach are comparable for the treatment of distal tibial fractures.

According to a study performed at Orthopedic Clinic, University Hospital of Parma Italy explains that the locked plate (LP) and intramedullary nailing (IMN), both surgical approaches exhibited similar radiological and clinical outcomes in the treatment of distal tibial fractures (DTF). The DTFs are one of the complex fractures with various complications. It is a therapeutic challenge to maintain DTF, with or without articular engagement. 

The study was aimed to compare radiological and clinical findings of LP and IMN surgical interventions to improve DTF condition and to predict the unfavourable results. The patients of age ≥18 years who treated at the first level trauma centre from 2008 to 2017 were involved and divided into two groups; first (IMN) and second (LP). The registration of data related to the surgical procedure and demographic variables were done. The nonunions and malunions were identified at the follow-up using X-ray. Clinical findings were determined on the basis of scores and any complication.

A total of 81 patients were involved in group 2 and 102 in group 1. Group 2 individuals were associated with higher operating time and hospitalisation. The union time noticed for LP and IMN were 24.8 and 20.2 weeks, respectively (p = 0.271). The patients of group one were more prone to anterior knee pain and malunion whereas group two patients found to be more susceptible to wound complications and infections. After the six months, no difference was noticed regarding clinical findings. LP group exhibited longer full-weight bearing time (p = 0.019). No predictive power for unfavourable results during multivariate analysis was seen. These outcomes reflected that both the interventions showed similar findings. 

Source:

International Orthopaedics

Article:

Treatment of distal tibial fractures: prospective comparative study evaluating two surgical procedures with investigation for predictive factors of unfavourable outcome.

Authors:

Enrico Vaienti et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en
Try: