EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

Back
H. pylori.infection H. pylori.infection
H. pylori.infection H. pylori.infection

What's new?

The H. pylori elimination rate of high-dose dual therapy is comparable to bismuth-containing quadruple therapy in H. pylori-infected treatment-naive people.

A prospective, open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial depicted that for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) elimination, high-dose dual therapy exhibited comparable effectiveness and compliance, fewer side effects, and reduced costs when compared to bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for treatment-naive people infected with H. pylori.

For comparing two different therapies, 700 participants were randomized to get high-dose dual therapy (20 mg esomeprazole 4 times daily and 1000 mg amoxicillin 3 times daily for fourteen days, n=350) or bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (20 mg esomeprazole, 1000 mg amoxicillin, 500 mg clarithromycin, and 220 mg bismuth potassium citrate all twice daily for fourteen days, n=350).

A comparison of efficacy, costs, adverse events, and patient compliance was done. Both the groups attained comparable H. pylori elimination rates. Compared to the quadruple therapy group, the high-dose dual therapy group exhibited a reduced rate of adverse events and reduced costs. Both the study groups revealed satisfactory compliance, as illustrated in Table 1:

Thus, bismuth-containing quadruple therapy and high-dose dual therapy have similar compliance and effectiveness in H. pylori-infected treatment-naive people.

Source:

Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy

Article:

Comparison of high-dose dual therapy with bismuth-containing quadruple therapy in Helicobacter pylori-infected treatment-naive patients: An open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial

Authors:

Jia-Lun Guan et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en ru
Try: